PROSODIC PROPERTIES OF CLAUSAL PARENTHETICALS IN SERBIAN

Authors

  • Gordana Ćirić Ognjenović Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18485/zivjez.2023.43.1.1

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of the prosodic properties of clausal parentheticals in Serbian in terms of their pitch, intensity, articulation rate and prosodic domain in relation the surrounding anchor clauses. Regarding the pitch and intensity, the results indicate that the utterance seems to follow a downward trend regardless of the parenthetical interpolation. Considering the rate of articulation, no pattern can be established in the behavior of clausal parentheticals in relation to their anchor clauses. When it comes to the intonational domain, the clausal parentheticals in Serbian tend to form separate intonational phrases, thus belonging to the group of ‘prototypical parenthesis’, in Dehé’s (2014) terms.

References

Altmann 1981: H. Altman, Formen der “Herausstellung” im Deutschen: Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, freies Thema und verwandte Konstruktionen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Bolinger 1989: D. Bolinger, Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Brandt 1994: M. Brandt, Subordination und Parenthese als Mittel der Informationsstrukturierung in Texten. Sprache und Pragmatik 32: 1–37.

Crystal 1969: D. Crystal, Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.

Dehé & Kavalova 2007: N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova, Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Dehé 2014: N. Dehé, Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP.

Döring 2007: S. Döring, Quieter, faster, lower, and set off by pauses? Reflections on prosodic aspects of parenthetical constructions in modern German. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 284-306.

Jung: 1980: W. Jung, Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.

Kavalova, Y. (2007). And-parenthetical clauses. In N. Dehé & Y. Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 145-172.

Kluck 2011: M. Kluck, Sentence amalgamation. Groningen: LOT: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.

Ladd 1986: Ladd, Intonational phrasing: the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3, 311-40.

Nespor & Vogel 1986: M. Nespor & I. Vogel, Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

Öhlschläger 1996: G. Öhlschläger, Überlegungen zur Funktion von Parenthesen. In Sprache und Kommunikation im Kulturkontext: Beiträge zum Ehrenkolloquium aus Anlaß des 60. Geburtstages von Gotthard Lerchner. V. Hertel, I.

Barz, R. Metzler and B. Uhlig (eds), 315–24. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Pierrehumbert 1987: J. Pierrehumbert, The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.

Potts 2005: C. Potts, The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.

Schwyzer 1939: E. Schwyzer, Die Parenthese im engern und im weitern Sinne. [Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften]. Berlin: Verlag der Akademie der Wissenschaften/ Walter de Gruyter.

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Wichmann, A. (2001). Spoken parentheticals. In A Wealth of English (Studies in Honour of Göran Kjellmer), K. Aijmer (ed), 177–193. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Ćirić Ognjenović, G. (2023). PROSODIC PROPERTIES OF CLAUSAL PARENTHETICALS IN SERBIAN. Živi Jezici: Journal for Foreign Languages and Literatures, 43(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.18485/zivjez.2023.43.1.1

Issue

Section

Linguistics