PRIORITY MODALITY IN POLITICAL WRITING – THE CASE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SERBIA 2019 REPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18485/zivjez.2020.40.1.2Keywords:
political writing, modality, priority modality, obligatives, subjectivityAbstract
This study aims to analyse modal phrases in the European Commission’s Serbia 2019 report and to draw conclusions about modality in political writing in general. 560 phrases with modal meaning were identified in the report. The most frequent are modal verbs need and should and adverbs still and yet. The verb following the modal form is usually in passive. Almost all the modals belong to the category of priority modality, most commonly deontic. All priority modals analysed are directives, specifically obligatives. All priority modal verbs were used subjectively. The study concludes that political writing in general is of modal nature.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).